Arguments in Favor of Hunting with Dogs
The debate over the morality of using dogs for hunting doesn't come up as often as other issues surrounding hunting, but that doesn't mean there aren't strong arguments for both sides. Supporters view the method as morally sound and believe it should be their right to use dogs.
Limber Tail Syndrome Limber Tail Syndrome, or "Cold Water Tail," is a common ailment among
hunting dogs. While its cause hasn't been nailed down, it's believed
that it's the result of hard workouts like heavy hunting, or being
submerged in water that's uncomfortably hot or cold. You can see when a
dog is suffering by paying attention to its tail. Normally, the first
three or four inches of a dog's tail (seven to 10 cm) should stick up
from the body before it droops. A dog with Limber Tail will have its
tail clamped down against its body directly from the base. This ailment
clears up on its own in about two weeks [source:Woodhaven Labs]. |
The most common argument in favor of hunting is population control. Hunting with dogs can help a hunter successfully bag an overpopulated animal. If successful population control is the overall goal, what does it matter how the animals are hunted? Shouldn't hunters use the most successful method available?
Dogs track animals more easily than humans do. They bring the prey into close range, giving the hunter a clear shot. Most hunters believe the kill should be quick and clean, and getting a clear shot helps them hit the prey in the specific target area to achieve a more humane death.
Dogs are exposed to the elements when they participate in hunting, but a good owner can watch over a canine companion, keeping close watch over any changes in behavior or indications of harm.
So what does the other side have to say? Go to the next page to learn why some people disapprove of bringing dogs out on the hunt.
